ArticleScientific reports2026
Gene editing of the GJB2 locus in porcine embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 and cytosine base editors: toward a model of congenital deafness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in the GJB2 gene, which encodes Connexin 26 (Cx26), are responsible for the majority of cases of non-syndromic congenital hearing loss in humans. While murine GJB2 knockout models have provided mechanistic insight, anatomical and physiological differences limit their translational relevance. Pigs represent a valuable large-animal model because their auditory anatomy and maturation closely resemble those of humans. This study compared two genome-editing approaches to disrupt GJB2 in porcine oocytes before fertilization: (1) electroporation with CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and (2) microinjection with cytosine base editor (BE3) and single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs). Electroporation produced high mutation rates (70–90%) across three concentrations of Cas9/sgRNA but yielded mostly heterozygous or mosaic blastocysts, with limited homozygous knockouts (< 4%). BE3 achieved precise cytosine-to-thymine conversions that introduced premature stop codons, reaching up to 47% total editing and 20% homozygous nonsense alleles. However, blastocyst formation declined at higher component concentrations. Overall, BE3 produced more predictable mutations than conventional CRISPR/Cas9, although embryo developmental competence was dose-dependent. Both methods effectively targeted GJB2 and demonstrated feasibility of pre-fertilization genome editing in porcine oocytes. These findings establish the groundwork for generating GJB2-deficient pigs as translational models of Cx26-related congenital deafness and for future evaluation of gene-therapy strategies in a large-animal system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.