Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000858›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and validation of an immune-related diagnostic signature for breast cancer bone metastasis.

Jing Tang, Qiang Liu, Zhengyong Tao, Ningkui Niu, Wenhua Zhan, Jiandang Shi, Zongqiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Tang *Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Qiang Liu *First Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Zhengyong Tao *First Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Ningkui NiuDepartment of Orthopedic, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Wenhua ZhanDepartment of Orthopedic, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China. zhanwhgood@163.com.
Jiandang ShiDepartment of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China. shijiandang@nxmu.edu.cn.
Zongqiang YangDepartment of Orthopedic, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China. yzq_nyzy@126.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province 2024AAC03655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is one of the distant metastases in patients with Breast Cancer (BC). However, the mechanism of BC bone metastasis is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential mechanisms linking bone metastasis-related genes and BC.The training set consisted of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-BC dataset, which included 1,104 breast cancer samples (comprising 50 with bone metastasis and 1,052 without) and 114 adjacent normal samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs1) between breast cancer and normal tissues, as well as DEGs2 between breast cancer bone metastatic and non-bone metastatic tissues, were identified. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was then applied to screen breast cancer-related module genes. The intersection of these three sets was taken to obtain candidate genes. Diagnostic genes were identified via univariate Cox regression and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) analysis to construct a risk model, which was subsequently validated using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE20685 (327 samples, validation set). Furthermore, immune infiltration analysis, mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA regulatory network construction, and drug sensitivity analysis were performed in the training set. Finally, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was conducted on clinical samples for validation.There were 756 DEGs between BC and control samples. A sum of 6 BC-related modules were acquired by WGCNA. After screening, 997 bone metastasis-associated genes and 73 candidate genes were acquired. A total of 6 diagnostic genes, namely ABHD8, ESRRA, DHPS, ISOC2, MRPL34 and OGFR, were obtained to construct the risk model. Results of the immune microenvironment analysis revealed that the high-risk group exhibited lower levels of certain immune cells, such as T cells and CD8+ T cells. Based on the public database,ESRRA was regulated by various miRNAs, such as hsa-miR-185-3p, hsa-miR-2115-5p. Based on the results of molecular docking experiments, a sum of 67 drugs had significant differences in IC50 between two risk subgroups. Transcriptomic data from TCGA indicated that all six diagnostic genes were significantly upregulated in the BC group (p < 0.05). However, qRT-PCR validation showed that ESRRA and OGFR were significantly downregulated in the BC group (p < 0.05), while the expression trends of the remaining four genes were consistent with the transcriptomic data.We explored the diagnostic genes (ABHD8, ESRRA, DHPS, ISOC2, MRPL34, and OGFR) of bone metastasis in BC, providing a reference for disease-related study.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsBreast cancerDiagnostic signatureGEOImmune characteristicsOsseous metastasisTCGA

Identifiers

PMID42000858
PMCPMC13272898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.