ArticleScientific reports2026
Neural and behavioral signatures of error monitoring are differentially modulated by social hierarchy and trial type.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Error monitoring is shaped by both internal task demands and external social context. However, the interplay between these factors remains underexplored. This study investigated how social rank and trial type jointly modulate behavioral and neural correlates of error processing. Participants first underwent a rank induction task to simulate hierarchical social context and then completed a Go/Nogo task while EEG was recorded. We examined response times (RTs), post-error slowing (PES), error-related potentials (ERN and Pe), and oscillatory power in the delta and theta frequency bands. Pe amplitude and PES were modulated by social rank. Erroneous responses to lower ranks were followed by greater amplitude of Pe and longest PES. In contrast, ERN and delta/theta power were modulated by trial type but not by rank; false alarms elicited greater ERN amplitudes and elevated delta/theta power compared to correct hits, reflecting domain-general error detection mechanisms. These findings reveal a dissociation between social and task-related influences on error processing and highlight distinct neural systems for automatic error detection versus socially contextualized awareness and adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.