Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000845›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A physics-guided temporal convolutional learning with XGBoost integration for degradation-aware and robust electric vehicle range prediction.

Kaliappan Esakkiappan, P Gowtham, V Beula Shanthi Ammani Ammal, D Shalini, T Mariprasath, Seif Al Bustanji, Viktoriia Bereznychenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaliappan EsakkiappanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, India.
P GowthamDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KIT-Kalaignar Karunanidhi Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
V Beula Shanthi Ammani AmmalDepartment of Physics, Jerusalem College of Engineering, Chennai, India.
D ShaliniDepartment of Physics, Vel Tech Multi Tech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India.
T MariprasathDepartment of EEE, K.S.R.M College of Engineering, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Seif Al BustanjiFaculty of Technical Education, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research (HCASR), Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Viktoriia BereznychenkoNational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Akademika Palladina Avenue, 34-A, Kyiv, Ukraine. vika.bereznichenko@i.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of electric vehicle (EV) driving range is fundamental for alleviating range anxiety, improving route planning, and enabling reliable battery and energy management under real-world operating conditions. However, prevailing range prediction frameworks typically depend on instantaneous state-of-charge (SoC) and nominal battery capacity, implicitly assuming ideal battery behavior and neglecting the irreversible degradation induced by cycling, thermal stress, and heterogeneous charging practices. Conventional machine learning and deep learning methods often fail to represent these degradation dynamics, either because they ignore temporal dependencies or function as non-interpretable black-box models, thereby limiting their applicability in safety-critical battery management systems. This work introduces a Physics-Guided Temporal Convolutional Network integrated with XGBoost (PG-TCN-XGB)—a unified, degradation-aware predictive architecture designed to overcome these limitations. A key contribution of this study is the formulation of a Degradation Memory Index (DMI), a physics-derived cumulative descriptor that encodes long-term battery stress by jointly considering energy throughput, temperature deviation, and charging intensity. By embedding DMI directly into temporal feature learning, the model differentiates between identical SoC states arising from distinct degradation histories, thereby enabling physically consistent range estimates. The PG-TCN component leverages causal and dilated convolutions to model both short-horizon driving fluctuations and long-horizon behavioral and degradation patterns with high computational efficiency. These learned temporal embeddings are subsequently refined by an XGBoost regressor, which captures residual nonlinearities and mitigates noise sensitivity typical of real-world telemetry. Comprehensive evaluation using a large-scale real EV dataset containing battery characteristics, driving behavior, environmental variables, and charging-infrastructure indicators demonstrates that the proposed hybrid method significantly outperforms ensemble learning (Extra Trees, XGBoost) and deep learning baselines (LSTM, BiLSTM-Attention, CNN-LSTM). The PG-TCN-XGB model achieves superior performance with an RMSE of 0.037 and an R² of 0.978, with stability further confirmed through cross-validation. These results establish that combining physics-based degradation modeling with temporal deep learning and robust boosting strategies yields a substantial improvement in predictive accuracy, generalization across operating conditions, and interpretability. Overall, this study provides one of the first end-to-end physics-guided, degradation-aware temporal learning frameworks for EV range prediction, addressing critical gaps in current modeling approaches and offering a scalable, interpretable solution for next-generation EV energy management systems.

Indexed as

Battery degradationDegradation memory indexElectric vehicle range predictionHybrid machine learningPhysics-guided learningTemporal Convolutional NetworkTime-series modelingXGBoost integration

Identifiers

PMID42000845
PMCPMC13254058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.