Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000833›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Peering Inside the Black Box: Explainable AI to Interpret Advanced Computer Vision Fungal Pathogen Prediction.

Joshua D Guthrie, Shamanth A Shankarnarayan, Daniel A Charlebois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua D Guthrie *Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shamanth A Shankarnarayan *Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Daniel A CharleboisDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. dcharleb@ualberta.ca.

Funding

Alberta Innovates Accelerating Innovations into Care - Concepts AICE-Concepts 597389uman Frontier Science Program RGEC30/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern, with pathogenic fungi making a substantial contribution to untreatable life-threatening infections across the globe. Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in microbiology and antimicrobial resistance research, with promise to improve clinical diagnostics and infectious disease treatments. However, how AI models make predictions remains largely unknown, which is a major hurdle for human trust and regulatory approval. We train vision transformers (Swin Transformer-Tiny and Vision Transformer-Base 16) and convolutional neural networks (DenseNet121 and InceptionV3) to quickly and accurately identify pathogenic yeast species from microscopy images. Using explainable AI (Occlusion Sensitivity and Grad-CAM), we identify biologically relevant features (organelle, cell interior, cell wall, budding patterns/scars, and optical patterns) and irrelevant image features (background artifacts) these high-performance computer vision models may be using for pathogenic yeast classification. These findings improve AI-based microscopy classification of pathogenic yeast species and advance our understanding of the visual features these models rely on to make predictions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFungiConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyComputer visionExplainable AIPathogenic yeast classification

Identifiers

PMID42000833
PMCPMC13260919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.