ArticleScientific reports2026
Peering Inside the Black Box: Explainable AI to Interpret Advanced Computer Vision Fungal Pathogen Prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-Guided Cross-Modal Interaction for Multimodal Yeast Classification Based on Light-Scattering and Microscopy Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted Classification of Pathogenic Yeasts Using Laser Light Scattering and Conventional Microscopy.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-enabled fungal biomanufacturing: from genome mining to the artificial intelligence virtual cell.Mycology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern, with pathogenic fungi making a substantial contribution to untreatable life-threatening infections across the globe. Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in microbiology and antimicrobial resistance research, with promise to improve clinical diagnostics and infectious disease treatments. However, how AI models make predictions remains largely unknown, which is a major hurdle for human trust and regulatory approval. We train vision transformers (Swin Transformer-Tiny and Vision Transformer-Base 16) and convolutional neural networks (DenseNet121 and InceptionV3) to quickly and accurately identify pathogenic yeast species from microscopy images. Using explainable AI (Occlusion Sensitivity and Grad-CAM), we identify biologically relevant features (organelle, cell interior, cell wall, budding patterns/scars, and optical patterns) and irrelevant image features (background artifacts) these high-performance computer vision models may be using for pathogenic yeast classification. These findings improve AI-based microscopy classification of pathogenic yeast species and advance our understanding of the visual features these models rely on to make predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.