Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000832›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hydrogen storage capacity planning and system balance analysis based on multi time scale adjustment of demand probability distribution.

Keteng Jiang, Han Jiang, Borui Liao, Haibo Li, Jinming Hou, Jinyu Xiao, Dehai Zhang, Zongxiang Lu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keteng Jiang *Sichuan Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Chengdu, 610213, China.
Han Jiang *Global Energy Interconnection Group Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100032, China.
Borui LiaoSichuan Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Chengdu, 610213, China.
Haibo LiSichuan Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Chengdu, 610213, China. lihaibo@tsinghua-eiri.org.
Jinming HouGlobal Energy Interconnection Group Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100032, China.
Jinyu XiaoGlobal Energy Interconnection Group Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100032, China.
Dehai ZhangSichuan Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Chengdu, 610213, China.
Zongxiang LuSichuan Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Chengdu, 610213, China.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China Joint Fund U23B20111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the penetration rate of renewable energy continues to rise, power systems face the dual challenges of heightened uncertainty in wind and solar output and cross-seasonal energy imbalances. Short-term energy storage struggles to meet long-term regulation demands, prompting widespread interest in hydrogen as a potential long-duration storage solution. However, challenges remain in addressing the coupled relationship between multi-timescale regulation requirements in hydrogen planning and the insufficient system robustness under deterministic methodologies. To address this, this paper first constructs a Gaussian mixed Copula probabilistic model accounting for wind and solar output correlations. Opportunity constraints are employed to define the feasible range of reserve capacity meeting wind and solar output regulation requirements. Subsequently, a multi-timescale stochastic optimization planning framework is proposed, integrating ‘monthly capacity allocation with hourly sequential operation’. This leverages the cross-seasonal energy storage characteristics of hydrogen systems to achieve power and energy balance. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method reduces total costs by 1.55% compared to traditional deterministic planning, achieving a system balancing probability of 99.21%. This represents improvements of 0.08% and 0.40% over single-stage planning and conventional energy storage planning respectively, validating its effectiveness in enhancing operational reliability. Sensitivity analysis further indicates that reduced hydrogen storage costs and enhanced hydrogen production efficiency contribute to higher system balancing probabilities. Beyond a 95% confidence level for wind and solar resources, the rate of improvement in balancing probability slows. wind-dominated systems exhibit a 0.26% higher balance probability than Photovoltaic -dominated systems. These findings provide crucial technical guidance for stochastic planning in high-penetration renewable electricity systems.

Indexed as

Hydrogen energyMulti-timescale planningPower and electricity balanceStochastic planningWind and solar variability

Identifiers

PMID42000832
PMCPMC13254315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.