ArticleScientific reports2026
Hydrogen storage capacity planning and system balance analysis based on multi time scale adjustment of demand probability distribution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the penetration rate of renewable energy continues to rise, power systems face the dual challenges of heightened uncertainty in wind and solar output and cross-seasonal energy imbalances. Short-term energy storage struggles to meet long-term regulation demands, prompting widespread interest in hydrogen as a potential long-duration storage solution. However, challenges remain in addressing the coupled relationship between multi-timescale regulation requirements in hydrogen planning and the insufficient system robustness under deterministic methodologies. To address this, this paper first constructs a Gaussian mixed Copula probabilistic model accounting for wind and solar output correlations. Opportunity constraints are employed to define the feasible range of reserve capacity meeting wind and solar output regulation requirements. Subsequently, a multi-timescale stochastic optimization planning framework is proposed, integrating ‘monthly capacity allocation with hourly sequential operation’. This leverages the cross-seasonal energy storage characteristics of hydrogen systems to achieve power and energy balance. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method reduces total costs by 1.55% compared to traditional deterministic planning, achieving a system balancing probability of 99.21%. This represents improvements of 0.08% and 0.40% over single-stage planning and conventional energy storage planning respectively, validating its effectiveness in enhancing operational reliability. Sensitivity analysis further indicates that reduced hydrogen storage costs and enhanced hydrogen production efficiency contribute to higher system balancing probabilities. Beyond a 95% confidence level for wind and solar resources, the rate of improvement in balancing probability slows. wind-dominated systems exhibit a 0.26% higher balance probability than Photovoltaic -dominated systems. These findings provide crucial technical guidance for stochastic planning in high-penetration renewable electricity systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.