Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Tripolar versus bipolar ablation: insights into lesion growth and geometry using a novel ablation approach for therapy-refractory ventricular arrhythmias.

Fabian Bahlke, Edison Abdiu, Emily Schultz, Nico Erhard, Florian Englert, Alexander Duda, Hannah Krafft, Miruna Popa, Jan Syväri, Madeleine Tydecks and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Fabian BahlkeDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany. bahlke@dhm.mhn.de.
Edison AbdiuDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Emily SchultzDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Nico ErhardDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Florian EnglertDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Alexander DudaAbbott Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hannah KrafftDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Miruna PopaDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Jan SyväriDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Madeleine TydecksDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Alex Tunsch MartinezDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Theresa ReiterDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Marta TelishevskaDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Eva KoopsDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Sarah LengauerDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Gabriele HesslingDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Isabel DeisenhoferDepartment of Electrophysiology, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Raphael SpittlerDepartment of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, Center of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BA) is often limited by high impedance between the two ablation catheters in cases of therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardias. Tripolar ablation (TA) is a novel approach, adding a dispersive return electrode to BA. The study aimed to investigate differences in lesion growth and geometry in BA and TA using variable power (20-50W) during power-controlled, irrigated radiofrequency ablation on cross-sections of porcine heart preparations in an ex-vivo model. Using high-resolution imaging at one-second intervals, 1694 measurements in 40 lesions were analyzed regarding lesion geometries and ablation parameters. Baseline impedance was lower in TA (213.1 ± 20.6 Ω vs. 242.7 ± 23.6 Ω, p < 0.001) and distinct differences in lesion geometry were present. Specifically, TA produced deeper and wider lesions at the active catheter compared to the return catheter, resulting in trapezoidal lesions in contrast to rectangular lesions in BA. All lesions reached transmurality; however, lesion width continued to increase in BA and TA after transmurality had been achieved. The majority of steam pops (16/18) occurred above 40W without differences in BA and TA. In cases of high baseline impedance, TA using an additional dispersive return electrode seems effective. In this experimental setup, TA creates trapezoidal lesions in contrast to rectangular lesions in BA without an associated increase in the risk of steam pops.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationTachycardia, VentricularAnimalsElectrodesHeart VentriclesSwineAblation of ventricular tachycardiaBipolar ablationLesion formationRadiofrequency ablationTherapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID42000829
PMCPMC13091789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.