Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000822›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-layer causal knowledge network for product quality problem analysis using third data.

Yubin Wang, Ruidong Fan, Xin Yue, Fangzhou Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yubin WangSchool of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China.
Ruidong FanSchool of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Xin YueCollege of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116023, China.
Fangzhou LiSchool of Management, Zhengzhou Shengda University, Zhengzhou, 451191, China. 103376@shengda.edu.cn.

Funding

Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi 2023W085Shanxi Provincial Basic Research Program-Free Exploration Category 202303021222085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The realization of digital intelligence is inseparable from the collection and effective application of knowledge. However, in the production process of enterprises, there is a type of “Third Data” which is rich in empirical knowledge but has not been paid attention to. This kind of data is generated from the records of the process in which enterprise employees solve quality problems and is the externalization of empirical knowledge. Because causal analysis is the key to solving quality problems, and there are many factors affecting the cause analysis and the analysis process is complex, this paper makes full use of the causal knowledge and problem contexts contained in the “Third Data”, and systematically considered the duality of cause analysis, the situation dependence of quality problems, the diversity of situations, the similarity among actual quality problems, the differences between short-term solutions and long-term solutions, then proposed the concept of Multi-layer Causal Knowledge Network(MCKN). Next, this paper analyzes the composition and expression of MCKN, and the corresponding construction process and steps are given. Finally, through the case study, the scientificity, rationality, and effectiveness of MCKN are verified. MCKN proposed in this paper provides new ideas and methods for comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the causality of quality problems and helps to improve the level of knowledge and intelligence of quality management.

Indexed as

Causal analysisMulti-layer causal knowledge networkQuality managementThird data

Identifiers

PMID42000822
PMCPMC13249839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.