ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the relationship between inhibitory control and coping behaviour in horses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to flexibly adapt to the demands of a stressful situation is a key factor in successful coping. Appropriate coping is of critical importance in artificial environments, which may include novel and potentially stressful situations. Being able to inhibit immediate but counterproductive reactions, and thus exert inhibitory control, might allow to better adapt to the environment. Horses are required to flexibly adapt to various housing conditions and training techniques; however, not all horses successfully cope as evidenced by the prevalence of stereotypical behaviours. We tested 31 mares in an inhibitory control test battery (A-not-B detour test, delay of gratification test, reversal learning test) and assessed their behavioural and stress-physiological reaction during two husbandry conditions (social isolation and food omission). All three inhibition tests revealed behaviours indicative of inhibitory control, which could be well represented by four components resulting from a PCA (inhibition, indecisiveness, learning capacity, flexibility). The variation in coping behaviour could be captured by six components (nervousness, stress, anticipation, reactivity, oral motivation, vigilance). We found that reactivity and vigilance were positively related to inhibition. Reactivity was additionally negatively related to indecisiveness and positively related to flexibility. These findings may suggest that inhibitory control is an underlying mechanism involved in flexible responding, which may ultimately facilitate successful coping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.