ArticleScientific reports2026
LightAttn-YOLO-V8: an efficient colorectal polyp detection with lightweight attention mechanism based on YOLO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer has a high rate of mortality globally, often originating from polyps that, if detected early, can significantly improve patient outcomes. This study proposes an improved polyp detection method by incorporating a lightweight attention mechanism into the YOLOv8 framework, resulting in a model referred to as LightAttn-YOLO-V8. Our methodology is crafted to address the complexities of polyp detection in endoscopic images, where discrepancies in size, form, and appearance hinder precise identification. By integrating both channel and spatial attention mechanisms, our model focuses on essential features while ensuring computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time clinical use. We trained and assessed our model on a comprehensive dataset that includes Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ClinicDB, ETIS, and CVC-ColonDB, yielding outstanding outcomes. On the ETIS dataset, our model achieved a recall of 93.9%, a precision of 97.6%, and an F1-score of 95.7%, whereas on CVC-ClinicDB, it reached a flawless recall of 100%, a precision of 99.3%, and an F1-score of 99.6%. These findings surpass many leading-edge methods, illustrating the capacity of our approach to improve early polyp detection and assist clinicians in alleviating the impact of colorectal cancer. Our research emphasizes the effectiveness of attention mechanisms in enhancing detection precision without significantly compromising speed, thereby paving the way for more reliable computer-aided diagnosis in endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.