ArticleScientific reports2026
Escape room-based learning for HPV vaccine education in Japanese female university students: a controlled, three-group study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japan's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage remains low, highlighting the need for engaging education for young adults. An escape-room intervention, a traditional lecture, and a non-intervention control were compared in Japanese female university students. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and three months later. Knowledge and vaccination intention were assessed at all time points; satisfaction and perceived comprehension were assessed immediately post-intervention; and HPV vaccination initiation was assessed at three months. Open-ended responses from the escape-room group were analyzed using quantitative content analysis based on Fink's taxonomy. For the 267 students (escape room n = 92; lecture n = 75; control n = 100), the lecture produced greater immediate gains in knowledge and intention. At three months, both intervention groups retained higher knowledge than the control group, with no difference between escape room and lecture. In participants unvaccinated at baseline (0 doses), vaccination intention increased more from baseline to three months in the escape-room group than in the control group, whereas vaccination initiation was significantly higher in the lecture group. Qualitative findings suggested the escape room promoted emotional engagement, intrinsic motivation, and peer collaboration. Escape rooms may complement traditional vaccine education by providing an interactive, low-resource format that supports learning and motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.