ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-strategy enhanced black-winged kite algorithm and its engineering applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic Modulus Prediction of Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixtures Based on XGBoost Optimized by an Improved Black-Winged Kite Algorithm.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Black-winged Kite Algorithm (BKA) is a metaheuristic algorithm inspired by the bird's migratory and predatory behaviors. While demonstrating strong adaptability, few parameters, and high convergence precision, the BKA algorithm tends to converge prematurely and exhibits slow convergence speed when solving complex optimization problems. To address these issues, this paper proposes a Multi-strategy Enhanced Black-winged Kite Algorithm (MSEBKA) incorporating four key improvements: First, in the attack phase, an adaptive inertia weight (AIW) strategy is introduced to reduce sensitivity to the quality of random numbers, enhance search stability, and effectively balance global exploration and local exploitation. Second, embedding an elite pool (EP) strategy during the migration phase enhances population diversity by integrating information from multiple elite individuals. Next, after the migration phase is completed, a dynamic Gaussian random walk (DGRW) strategy is adopted to perturb the black-winged kite population, promoting the generation of new individuals and helping the algorithm escape from local optima and accelerate convergence. In addition, lens imaging opposition-based learning (LIOBL) strategy is introduced after each round of population updates to further enhance the ability to escape local optima by generating opposite solution for the current best search individual. To evaluate the performance of the proposed MSEBKA algorithm, three different experiments are carried out. The experimental results demonstrate that, (1) the proposed MSEBKA algorithm not only outperforms the BKA algorithm and its four ablated variants on 6 out of 10 of the CEC2019 benchmark functions regarding mean fitness value and standard deviation, but also shows better convergence performance on all functions, (2) Evaluated on CEC2019, 23 classic and CEC2021 benchmark functions, the proposed MSEBKA algorithm shows superior overall performance, attaining notably better Friedman mean ranks (1.250, 1.804 and 1.550) compared to the BKA algorithm (4.950, 3.000 and 2.550) and five other mainstream metaheuristic algorithms, (3) furthermore, the proposed MSEBKA algorithm is successfully applied to five typical constrained optimization problems and performs better than the BKA algorithm on the design problems of pressure vessel design, tension/compression spring design, welded beam design and speed reducer design, with respective performance improvements of 0.0345%, 0.0375%, 1.7164%, and 0.0016%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.