ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Revealing the interplay between flow dynamics and cavitation activity in a flow-through sonoreactor.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustic cavitation is a well-known approach to intensify chemical and physical processes. Despite extensive studies in the understanding of batch ultrasonic reactors, flow-through sonoreactors, which are more relevant to continuous and large-scale operation, have received limited attention. Hence, in this study, the role of fluid flow rate and the relative direction between bulk flow and ultrasound propagation (co-current and counter-current) on sonochemical activity and cavitation cloud characteristics in a tubular flow-through sonoreactor (low frequency = 35 kHz) is systematically investigated under different ultrasonic amplitudes. Characterization techniques were employed, including calorimetry to quantify dissipated acoustic power and ultrasonic efficiency, shadowgraphy imaging to characterize the size of the cavitation cloud, sonochemiluminescence (SCL) to map chemically active cavitation zones, and KI dosimetry to quantify radicals. The results show that increasing flow rate slightly enhances calorimetric power, while ultrasonic efficiency remains largely unchanged. Shadowgraphy reveals that cavitation clouds elongate with increasing flow rate up to an intermediate value, beyond which the extent of the cavitation cloud decreases. In contrast, SCL mapping demonstrates that stagnant conditions and low flow rates are more favourable to induce larger and more intense chemically active cavitation zones, indicating that not all cavitation bubbles contribute equally to radical formation. The higher radical production at higher amplitudes and lower flow rates is shown through KI dosimetry. Moreover, counter-current operation enhances the distribution of chemically active cavitation and radical generation, as well as sonochemical efficiency when compared with co-current flow. This is attributed to modified hydrodynamics and increased residence time within the sonication zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.