ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Mechanical modification and ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration for mass transfer intensification during blueberry convective drying.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the use of mechanical modification (MM) and ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration (OD + US) as process-intensification strategies before convective drying of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). MM (cutting and perforation) were combined with osmotic dehydration at 40-60°Brix, with ultrasound applied at 37 kHz and 33.86 W/L to enhance mass transfer. Peleg modeling revealed that ultrasound increased water loss and solute gain during OD, attributed to cavitation-induced microchannel formation and enhanced solvent penetration through the berry skin. Although MM facilitated initial mass transfer, ultrasound promoted additional structural disruption, particularly in cut samples, as evidenced by viscoelastic weakening and altered rehydration behavior. Drying kinetics, described by the Page model, showed that pre-treatments reduced the time required to reach 12% moisture by over 30%, indicating effective process intensification. Bioactive compounds decreased after drying; however, ultrasound-assisted treatments retained higher levels after OD compared to non-sonicated samples, suggesting reduced oxidative degradation during mass transfer. Sorption isotherms fitted to the GAB model enabled shelf-life prediction, demonstrating extended stability under aluminum laminate packaging. The combined perforation and OD + US treatment at 50°Brix provided the most favorable balance between drying efficiency and quality retention. Overall, results demonstrate that ultrasound acoustic cavitation combined with MM and OD enhances mass transfer, modifies microstructure, and improves dehydration performance in blueberries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.