ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Spatiotemporal deep learning for scar screening in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Toward selective use of gadolinium.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Powered Detection of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar from Dual-Sequence CT: Global and Segmental Prediction Validated by CMR.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLate gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for assessing myocardial scar. However, a substantial proportion of patients referred for CMR scar assessment are ultimately found to have no evidence of myocardial scarring. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) model capable of identifying patients without myocardial scar using cine imaging alone, thereby obviating the need for contrast administration and LGE imaging in these individuals. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a novel spatiotemporal DL architecture to identify patients unlikely to have myocardial scar using contrast-free cine images. The model was trained on short-axis cine images from a consecutive cohort of 3000 patients (1753 males; mean age 54 ± 18 years) undergoing CMR for evaluation of known or suspected cardiovascular disease, using 1.5 and 3T scanners from Siemens and GE. External validation was performed in an independent multicenter cohort of 1792 patients where images were acquired on 1.5T and 3T scanners from Siemens and Philips. The architecture utilizes factorized convolutions to extract spatial and temporal features and incorporates residual attention mechanisms to emphasize features most predictive of scar presence on LGE imaging. To evaluate the incremental value of incorporating temporal information, a second model was developed that excluded the temporal kernel from the DL architecture. Both models were trained and optimized using the same training dataset and were evaluated based on similar internal and external testing cohorts. Model performance in identifying patients without myocardial scar was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe spatiotemporal model had a higher AUC compared to the spatial model in the internal (0.79 ± 0.02 vs. 0.70 ± 0.05, p<0.05, n = 500) and external cohort (0.78 vs. 0.64, p<0.001, n = 1792). The spatiotemporal model correctly identified 64% (176/274) and 52% (410/789) of patients without scar in the internal and external test sets, while maintaining a high sensitivity (86% and 82%).
conclusionsIncorporating temporal information from cine images using an end-to-end spatiotemporal DL architecture enables non-contrast screening for myocardial scar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.