ArticleCanadian journal of diabetes2026
Psychometric Properties of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Psychosocial Functioning in Adults With Complications Related to Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in Canadian journal of diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEcological momentary assessment (EMA) is a promising methodology for examining the contextual impact of psychosocial functioning on chronic disease management in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Little is known regarding psychometric properties of EMA of psychosocial functioning in adults with complications related to T1D. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility, reliability, and validity of EMA psychosocial measures examining depression, anxiety, diabetes-related distress, and fear of hypoglycemia in a sample of adult individuals with complications related to T1D.
methodsFifty-one participants with T1D completed a 14-day EMA of symptoms of depression, anxiety, diabetes-related distress, and fear of hypoglycemia. Multilevel linear models were used to evaluate the association of EMA psychosocial questions with standard psychosocial measures.
resultsFeasibility was demonstrated via high response rates across the 14-day EMA response period (3 times daily). All 4 EMA measures (depression, anxiety, diabetes-related distress, and fear of hypoglycemia) showed meaningful (i.e. ≥25%) within-person variability (from 28.7% in diabetes-related distress to 46.5% in fear of hypoglycemia). All measures exceeded between-person reliability of 0.8 within 1 to 3 days. None of the measures demonstrated significant diurnal patterns. Convergent validity was established via significant correlations between all aggregate EMA measures with corresponding "gold standard" surveys.
conclusionsOverall, findings support the psychometric properties (feasibility, reliability, and validity) of EMA of psychosocial measures in an adult cohort with complications related to T1D. This is the first study to date to examine psychometric properties of EMA of psychosocial measures examining depression, anxiety, diabetes-related distress, and fear of hypoglycemia simultaneously in an adult population with complications related to T1D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.