ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Private QTLs and the genetic architecture of hierarchical size traits: from body size to sex-specific plasticity.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex-specific size plasticity (SSP) is the phenomenon whereby the size of one sex is more environmentally sensitive than the other, and is thought to underlie the developmental regulation and evolution of sexual size dimorphism (SSD). Sex-specific plasticity is a higher-order phenotype that emerges from the effects of the environment and sex on core growth regulatory mechanisms. Genetic variation in SSP necessarily requires sex- and environment-specific variation in growth, yet the developmental-genetic mechanisms enabling such context-dependent size variation remain poorly understood. Using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and functional validation in Drosophila melanogaster, we dissected the genetic architecture of body size, size plasticity, SSD, and SSP across 196 isogenic lineages. We find that variation in each phenotype is governed by largely nonoverlapping sets of loci, with most candidate variants lying outside canonical growth pathways. Instead, size traits are shaped by private QTLs, whose effects are limited to specific sex, trait, or environmental contexts. Functional knockdown of selected candidate genes for SSP revealed that while most did not affect SSP directly, many influenced body size, SSD, and size plasticity, in a manner consistent with their nested phenotypic relationships. Together, our results suggest that context-dependent alleles in genes peripheral to core growth regulatory pathways drive variation in SSD and SSP, offering a mechanistic explanation for their evolutionary lability and highlighting the role of private QTLs in structuring the genetic architecture of complex traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.