Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41999474›Full record

ReviewJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026

A move toward patient dissatisfaction? A critical review of the disproportionate focus on patient satisfaction compared to dissatisfaction.

Henrik Pedersen, Jonas Vaag, Audun Havnen, Mariela L Lara-Cabrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik PedersenNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. henrik.pedersen@ntnu.no.
Jonas VaagInland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
Audun HavnenNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Mariela L Lara-CabreraNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction has been a widely used construct when measuring the patient perspective and a vital component of both patient-centered care and quality assurance. Nevertheless, several concerns regarding patient satisfaction have been raised in the literature. These include lack of definitional consensus and measurement standardization, consistently high satisfaction scores, and ceiling effects. Another concern is that striving for high satisfaction may incentivize pleasing the patient rather than delivering the highest-quality care.

objectiveThis critical review clarifies the concept of patient satisfaction, primarily by distinguishing it from related concepts such as patient experience and patient-centered care. The primary goal is to explore issues surrounding patient satisfaction and investigate its relationship with the underexamined concept of patient dissatisfaction. The discussion focuses on underlying problems and potential pathways toward improved usage and understanding of the patient satisfaction construct.

methodsGiven the conceptual nature of these topics, which are not easily addressed by a single research question, we chose an unsystematic critical review for its flexibility in addressing theoretical and methodological issues. DISCUSSION: Depending on the context and objective of its measurement, investigating and minimizing patient dissatisfaction may be more appropriate and may resolve many of the concerns raised by critics of patient satisfaction. This contrasts with current practices, which primarily focus on investigating and maximizing satisfaction. Thus, a complementary focus on patient dissatisfaction may offer utility for quality improvement. Finally, the article presents unresolved conceptual issues, along with suggestions for future research.

conclusionPatient dissatisfaction has remained a largely overlooked blind spot in patient satisfaction research and assessment. Resolving conceptual issues surrounding patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction and developing improved methods to identify pernicious dissatisfaction may render satisfaction scores more meaningful, thereby enhancing future quality-assurance evaluations.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionHumansQuality of Health CareDissatisfaction with treatmentHealthcare qualityPatient-centered carePatient dissatisfactionPatient satisfactionQuality assessmentSatisfaction with treatment

Identifiers

PMID41999474
PMCPMC13243156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.