ReviewJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
A move toward patient dissatisfaction? A critical review of the disproportionate focus on patient satisfaction compared to dissatisfaction.
Review in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction has been a widely used construct when measuring the patient perspective and a vital component of both patient-centered care and quality assurance. Nevertheless, several concerns regarding patient satisfaction have been raised in the literature. These include lack of definitional consensus and measurement standardization, consistently high satisfaction scores, and ceiling effects. Another concern is that striving for high satisfaction may incentivize pleasing the patient rather than delivering the highest-quality care.
objectiveThis critical review clarifies the concept of patient satisfaction, primarily by distinguishing it from related concepts such as patient experience and patient-centered care. The primary goal is to explore issues surrounding patient satisfaction and investigate its relationship with the underexamined concept of patient dissatisfaction. The discussion focuses on underlying problems and potential pathways toward improved usage and understanding of the patient satisfaction construct.
methodsGiven the conceptual nature of these topics, which are not easily addressed by a single research question, we chose an unsystematic critical review for its flexibility in addressing theoretical and methodological issues. DISCUSSION: Depending on the context and objective of its measurement, investigating and minimizing patient dissatisfaction may be more appropriate and may resolve many of the concerns raised by critics of patient satisfaction. This contrasts with current practices, which primarily focus on investigating and maximizing satisfaction. Thus, a complementary focus on patient dissatisfaction may offer utility for quality improvement. Finally, the article presents unresolved conceptual issues, along with suggestions for future research.
conclusionPatient dissatisfaction has remained a largely overlooked blind spot in patient satisfaction research and assessment. Resolving conceptual issues surrounding patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction and developing improved methods to identify pernicious dissatisfaction may render satisfaction scores more meaningful, thereby enhancing future quality-assurance evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.