SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2026
Meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy of connectome-based predictive modeling in OCD.
Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported disruptions in functional connectivity within brain networks, known as connectomes. Researchers have tested connectomes to see whether they serve as biomarkers for various psychiatric conditions. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of predictive models of connectomes derived from resting-state fMRI in diagnosing obsessive-compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on previous studies assessing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of connectome-based diagnostic models in obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy controls. Eight studies were identified, comprising 563 individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder and 564 healthy controls. The results revealed robust diagnostic performance with a pooled sensitivity of 0.827 (95% CI: 0.779-0.867) and specificity of 0.794 (95% CI: 0.759-0.826). Connectome-based diagnostic models demonstrated excellent clinical utility, with an area under the curve of 87% (95% CI: 84%-90%), and significant predictive power as indicated by positive (4.15) and negative (0.21) likelihood ratios, as well as strong diagnostic odds ratio of 18.69 (95% CI: 11.84-29.49). The results highlight the potential of functional connectome-based predictive modeling as a robust tool for accurately diagnosing obsessive-compulsive disorder, with possibility of future implications for early diagnosis, monitoring treatment-related changes, involving in decision modeling, and understanding the biological mechanisms underlying obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.