ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2026
Classification of decomposed neural data in memory networks and LLM-based stimuli processing.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Naturalistic paradigms, where participants are exposed to real-world stimuli (e.g., narratives) are important in memory research. They may provide a more complete assay of human memory processes and their underlying mechanisms compared to controlled task-based paradigm. In these paradigms, stimuli are continuous and do not have well-defined scene boundaries. Defining scene boundaries based on narrative events such as plot twists or character developments is crucial as these moments are known to influence memory recall. Aligning neural activity with such boundaries helps in studying the dynamics of memory recall during narrative experiences. However, segmenting narratives based on memory-driven cues is difficult due to the continuous flow of events. To overcome this, we developed an automatic scene segmentation technique using large language models (LLMs). The LLMs segment narratives into meaningful scenes offering a consistent unbiased method for recall-based segmentation. These segments are then used to analyze brain dynamics from fMRI data. In our study, 180 participants listened to four different stories while undergoing fMRI. Functional connectivity (FC) was computed based on the LLM-derived scene segments. For memory recall analysis, classification models were trained using participants’ recall scores as labels. To further understand the neural basis of memory, FC matrices were decomposed into shared (low-rank) and individual (idiosyncratic) components. Classification results demonstrate that LLM-based segmentation effectively defines scene boundaries and that memory recall is not solely tied to common or idiosyncratic activity. This approach offers a robust framework for exploring brain-behavior relationships in naturalistic memory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.