Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41999437›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2026

Classification of decomposed neural data in memory networks and LLM-based stimuli processing.

Muhammad Shahzaib, Salma Zainab Farooq, Eric H Schumacher, Shella D Keilholz, Sadia Shakil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad ShahzaibDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Salma Zainab FarooqDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Eric H SchumacherSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shella D KeilholzWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University/ Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sadia ShakilDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. sadiashakil@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturalistic paradigms, where participants are exposed to real-world stimuli (e.g., narratives) are important in memory research. They may provide a more complete assay of human memory processes and their underlying mechanisms compared to controlled task-based paradigm. In these paradigms, stimuli are continuous and do not have well-defined scene boundaries. Defining scene boundaries based on narrative events such as plot twists or character developments is crucial as these moments are known to influence memory recall. Aligning neural activity with such boundaries helps in studying the dynamics of memory recall during narrative experiences. However, segmenting narratives based on memory-driven cues is difficult due to the continuous flow of events. To overcome this, we developed an automatic scene segmentation technique using large language models (LLMs). The LLMs segment narratives into meaningful scenes offering a consistent unbiased method for recall-based segmentation. These segments are then used to analyze brain dynamics from fMRI data. In our study, 180 participants listened to four different stories while undergoing fMRI. Functional connectivity (FC) was computed based on the LLM-derived scene segments. For memory recall analysis, classification models were trained using participants’ recall scores as labels. To further understand the neural basis of memory, FC matrices were decomposed into shared (low-rank) and individual (idiosyncratic) components. Classification results demonstrate that LLM-based segmentation effectively defines scene boundaries and that memory recall is not solely tied to common or idiosyncratic activity. This approach offers a robust framework for exploring brain-behavior relationships in naturalistic memory research.

Indexed as

BrainMemoryMental RecallAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAutomatic scene segmentationFunctional connectivity (FC)Large Language Model (LLM)Low-rank approximationMemory recallNaturalistic stimuli

Identifiers

PMID41999437
PMCPMC13091883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.