ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
Integrating image processing and machine learning to enhance microalgal nitrate removal via optimized CO
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient nitrate removal in microalgal photobioreactors requires effective control of CO₂ gas holdup, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO). This study introduces an integrated image-processing and machine-learning framework to optimize these parameters for nitrate removal using Scenedesmus sp. First, CO₂ gas–liquid hydrodynamics were evaluated in a 50-L bubble column without microalgae. Image analysis quantified gas holdup at CO₂ flow rates of 1–7 L/min and identified 5 L/min as the optimal rate, yielding a maximum holdup of 0.35 before bubble coalescence reduced retention. A dataset of 287 paired pH–DO measurements was then used to train four regression models. Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) showed superior performance (RMSE = 0.0519; R² = 0.9966) in capturing the nonlinear pH–DO relationship, confirming that carbonate equilibrium and gas–liquid mass transfer remain the dominant controls even during microalgae cultivation.In the second stage, the optimized conditions (CO₂ = 5 L min⁻¹, pH 6.5–7.0) were applied during microalgal cultivation to maintain bicarbonate availability, minimize CO₂ stripping, and prevent DO oversaturation. Under these controlled conditions, NO₃⁻–N concentration decreased from 50 to 4 mg L⁻¹ within 14 days (91% removal). In contrast, the uncontrolled system achieved only 50–52% removal due to inhibited nutrient uptake caused by elevated pH (> 10) and excessive DO (> 25 mg/L). Enhanced biomass accumulation (0.12–0.13 g L⁻¹) under controlled conditions confirms that optimized CO₂ holdup and pH–DO regulation translate hydrodynamic optimization into improved biological performance. The integrated framework provides a practical, low-cost strategy for microalgae-based groundwater denitrification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.