ArticleProtoplasma2026
A validated in vitro approach for low-frequency alternating-current stimulation of stem cells: From electrode characterization to biological responses.
Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parameter-resolved AC electrical stimulation links electrical system characteristics to early transcriptional responses in human stem cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation remains a promising but insufficiently standardized approach in regenerative medicine, as many in vitro studies lack physically defined stimulation systems and quantitative characterization of cellular electric-field exposure. Here, we present a measurement-based framework integrating real-time electrical recordings, impedance-informed simulations, and electrode characterization under experimental conditions. Human adipose-derived stem cells were stimulated for three days at 20 Hz using sinusoidal alternating current at applied voltages of 1–3 Vrms. Simulations revealed spatially heterogeneous electric-field distributions, with exposure predominantly below 5 Vm⁻¹ at 1 Vrms and shifting toward 5–15 Vm⁻¹ at higher amplitudes. Moderate stimulation (1–2 Vrms) was not associated with detectable reductions in metabolic activity and was accompanied by maintained functional behaviour and stable reference gene expression, whereas 3 Vrms coincided with electrochemical interface alterations and reduced gene stability, suggesting the onset of stress-associated cellular responses. These findings identify a system-specific, biologically compatible and functionally active stimulation window and demonstrate that cellular responses are governed by the effective electrical dose rather than nominal voltage alone. The presented framework enables reproducible, impedance-controlled and quantitatively defined in vitro alternating-current stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.