ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Diagnosis of chronic Achilles tendinopathy in athletes and its treatment with prolotherapy and paratenon stripping.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is a frequent cause of pain and functional limitation in athletes. Although progressive loading programs remain the first-line therapy, a substantial proportion of patients continue to have symptoms and seek additional options. Ultrasound is central for diagnosis and treatment guidance, allowing detailed assessment of tendon structure, peritendinous involvement, and neovascularization. Several ultrasound-guided interventions have been proposed for recalcitrant cases, including needle tenotomy, high-volume injections, and platelet-rich plasma. Among these, hyperosmolar dextrose prolotherapy and paratenon stripping using local anesthetic have emerged as potential adjunctive techniques. While preliminary prospective series have reported encouraging reductions in pain and neovascularization, the current level of evidence remains limited by small cohorts and a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. This review summarizes current concepts regarding the pathophysiology and imaging of chronic Achilles tendinopathy, emphasizing the role of neovascularization and neoinnervation as potential pain generators. We outline a practical approach to diagnosis using ultrasound and complementary modalities. We then describe the technical aspects of ultrasound-guided paratenon stripping and intratendinous dextrose prolotherapy, including positioning, injection targets, and post-procedural care. Finally, we appraise the clinical evidence, discuss safety, and highlight priorities for future research. Overall, ultrasound-guided prolotherapy combined with paratenon stripping represents a biologically plausible and technically feasible adjunctive option for refractory cases; however, its definitive role within clinical practice remains to be established through higher-quality comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.