ReviewAnnals of medicine2026
GLP-1 receptor agonists in stroke prevention: a narrative review on emerging therapeutic frontiers.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the current evidence supporting the cerebrovascular protective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to outline their mechanisms of action in stroke prevention.
methodsA narrative review was conducted by synthesising data from cardiovascular outcome trials, meta-analyses and mechanistic studies involving GLP-1RAs such as semaglutide, liraglutide and dulaglutide. The search included literature on ischaemic stroke incidence, molecular pathways and clinical outcomes associated with GLP-1RA therapy.
resultsGLP-1RAs exhibit multiple protective mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective and endothelial-stabilising effects. Long-acting agents demonstrate superior efficacy in reducing nonfatal and ischaemic stroke risk, with relative risk reductions ranging from 15% to 39% across major trials. These benefits are observed independent of glycemic control and appear most prominent in patients with preserved renal function and shorter diabetes duration. In contrast, short-acting exendin-based GLP-1RAs show limited cerebrovascular benefit. Treatment response may vary based on factors such as stroke subtype, baseline vascular risk and comorbidities.
conclusionGLP-1RAs offer significant promise as adjunctive pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in individuals with T2DM. Their multifactorial benefits extend beyond glucose regulation and may influence clinical outcomes through systemic vascular and neuroprotective mechanisms. However, inconsistencies in trial outcomes and limited data in non-diabetic or high-risk populations underscore the need for targeted stroke-specific studies. Personalised treatment approaches and broader risk stratification may optimise their use in cerebrovascular disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.