ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Decoupled Climatic Drivers of Tree and Ground-Layer Carbon Uptake in Mountain Ecosystems Around the World.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the key ecological processes affected by climate change is plant carbon uptake. However, there is substantial uncertainty about how plant carbon uptake will respond to warming in mountain ecosystems, which are known for sharp temperature gradients and abrupt shifts in vegetation structure. Specifically, we lack an understanding of whether these response trajectories over time will be linear or non-linear, and how they might vary among mountain ecosystems globally. Here, we measured ecosystem Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) along forest-tundra elevational gradients in the mountain regions of five countries (Argentina, Australia, France, Sweden, USA) to infer future trajectories of carbon uptake, and whether any non-linear changes might occur. We also examined the role of microclimate in driving GPP responses. We found that whole-ecosystem GPP increased with increasing macroclimatic temperature (decreasing elevation), but this response was dominated by a sharp non-linear increase at the transition from tundra to forest (i.e., the treeline). In contrast, ground-layer GPP was largely independent of macroclimate, but often responded strongly, and linearly, to microclimate (growing degree days > 5°C, mean growing season temperature). This pattern reflected a frequent decoupling of microclimate from the expected temperature-elevation relationship, likely driven by such processes as cold-air drainage, limited near-surface air mixing, and shading by trees. The contrasting responses of GPP among global temperature gradients indicates strong context dependence at both local and continental scales, although in a few cases, biomass and leaf nitrogen were important moderators. These findings suggest that future shifts in carbon uptake in mountains will be mainly controlled by tree range expansion. Our results highlight the need to consider species responses on different spatial scales, and to increase representation of undersampled regions to capture the full breadth of ecological responses to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.