ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Smart Wound Dressings and the Biological Parameters They Monitor: A Scoping Review.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammasome-derived biomarkers in wound healing: linking tissue repair, chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and precision therapeutics.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Bioactive Hydrogel-MOF Composites as Resistance-Modulating Wound Interfaces: Molecular Mechanisms and Rational Design for Chronic Wound Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smart Polymeric Wound Dressings for Wound Treatment: Contributions and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in Smart Responsive Nanofibers for Wound Healing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Smart Biomaterials in Chronic Wound Therapy: Overcoming Biofilms, Resistance, and Translational Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic wounds represent a major global health and economic burden. Smart wound dressings integrate biosensing and stimuli-responsive materials to monitor and modulate biological parameters within the wound microenvironment. This scoping review maps the biological parameters monitored by smart wound dressings, an area not previously synthesized across preclinical and clinical contexts. Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR frameworks, five databases were searched in March 2025. Studies published between 2008 and 2025 reporting biosensing or responding technologies in wound dressings were included. A total of 179 studies met the inclusion criteria, most being preclinical (in vitro or in vivo rodent models), with few human investigations. The most frequently monitored parameters were pH, temperature, oxygenation, moisture, bacterial burden, and protease activity (particularly MMP-9). Preclinical data showed enhanced collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and infection control compared with conventional dressings, whereas human studies mainly assessed feasibility and biocompatibility. Smart dressings demonstrate strong technical and biological performance, but clinical validation and standardized outcome reporting remain limited. Future interdisciplinary research should prioritize well-designed clinical trials to confirm therapeutic and economic benefits and enable translation into personalized wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.