ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Use of Deep Learning Models in the Diagnosis of Proptosis Through Orbital Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proptosis is a common manifestation of orbital disease; however, current diagnostic tools, such as the Hertel exophthalmometer and manual radiological measurements, have limited reproducibility and are observer-dependent. More objective, automated approaches are needed. In this single-center retrospective study, orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations from 521 participants (261 with proptosis, 260 controls) were analyzed. Proptosis was defined on MRI using interzygomatic line-based distance criteria. Three-dimensional convolutional neural network models based on DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet264, and ResNet50 architectures were trained on volumetric orbital MRI data. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data were divided into training, validation, and test sets, and 5-fold cross-validation with early stopping was used to optimize and validate model performance. Diagnostic performance was assessed using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS DenseNet121 achieved the best overall performance, with mean accuracy of 95.0%, AUC of 0.986, sensitivity of 92.7%, and specificity of 96.9% across 5-fold cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, prior artificial intelligence studies in orbital imaging have primarily focused on CT-based measurements, radiomics approaches, or thyroid-associated orbitopathy assessment rather than end-to-end 3-dimensional deep learning analysis of orbital MRI volumes. In this context, the present study explores a volumetric MRI-based deep learning framework for automated proptosis detection, emphasizing patient-level classification and explainable model interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.