Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998888›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2026

Competing chemical gradients change chemotactic dynamics and cell distribution.

Emiliano Perez Ipiña, Brian A Camley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emiliano Perez IpiñaJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Brian A CamleyJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy and Department of Biophysics, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.

Funding

Physical insights into cell migrationR35GM142847 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Brian A Camley · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells are constantly exposed to diverse stimuli-chemical, mechanical, or electrical-that guide their movement. In physiological conditions, these signals often overlap, as seen during infections, where neutrophils and dendritic cells navigate through multiple chemotactic fields. How cells integrate and prioritize competing signals remains unclear. For instance, in the presence of opposing chemoattractant gradients, how do cells decide which direction to go? When should local signals dominate distant ones? A key factor in these processes is the precision with which cells sense each gradient, which depends nonmonotonically on concentrations. Here, we study how gradient sensing accuracy shapes cell navigation in the presence of two distinct chemoattractant sources. We model cells as active random walkers that sense local gradients and combine these estimates to reorient their movement. Our results show that cells sensing multiple gradients can display a range of chemotactic behaviors, including anisotropic spatial patterns and varying degrees of confinement, depending on gradient shape and source location. The model also predicts cases where cells exhibit multistep navigation across sources or a hierarchical response toward one source, driven by disparities in their sensitivity to each chemoattractant. These findings highlight the role of gradient sensing in shaping spatial organization and navigation strategies in multifield chemotaxis.

Indexed as

Chemotactic FactorsChemotaxisModels, BiologicalAnimalsChemotactic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41998888
PMCPMC13094728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.