ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Ear Piercing Complications: Comparing Cartilage and Soft Tissue Piercings in a Large Survey Cohort.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare complication and removal rates between cartilage and lobule ear piercings in a large adult population.
methodsAn anonymous electronic survey was distributed to all individuals with a University of Iowa email address. Respondents reported demographic characteristics, piercing site, age at piercing, technique, personnel, and specific complications. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated complication and removal rates between cartilage and lobule sites.
resultsData were analyzed on 9016 ear piercings from 3270 respondents, including 6275 (69.6%) lobule piercings and 2741 (30.4%) auricular cartilage piercings. Complications were reported in 40.2% of cartilage piercings versus 25.4% of lobule piercings (odds ratio [OR] 1.98, p < 0.0001). Infection occurred in 30.3% of cartilage piercings versus 23.8% of lobule piercings (OR 1.39, p < 0.0001). Additionally, cartilage site and presence of any complication each independently predicted piercing removal (OR 1.62, p < 0.0001; OR 12.82, p < 0.0001).
conclusionCartilage piercings carried significantly greater odds of complication and removal compared to lobule piercings. These findings underscore the importance of thorough counseling and informed consent, especially when piercing through auricular cartilage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.