ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Estrogen receptor-positive, BRCA1-deficient breast cancer: BRCA1-epimutated tumors presenting a piece to the puzzle.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the majority of breast cancers arising in women with germline BRCA1 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1) are triple-negative (TNBC), these women also have a moderately increased risk of ER+ breast cancers. The contribution of BRCA1 deficiency to the development of ER+ breast cancers in gBRCA1 carriers is incompletely understood. BRCA1 epimutations (promoter hypermethylation) have emerged as a major factor in TNBC. About 25–30% of all TNBCs harbor clonal BRCA1 epimutations. In the majority of these patients, the tumor seems to arise from small subclones of normal cells harboring constitutional BRCA1 epimutations. Mirroring findings for gBRCA1 carriers, a minor fraction of ER+ breast cancers seems to arise from BRCA1 epimutated subclones as well. An important difference between normal cells in individuals harboring gBRCA1 pathogenic variants and BRCA1 constitutional epimutations is that constitutional epimutations are mosaic, most often affecting < 1% of an individual’s cells. Considering cancers arising in gBRCA1 carriers, where all cells of the individual are affected, in some cases BRCA1 deficiency may be of limited importance to the tumorigenesis; the BRCA1 variants could be passenger events only. In contrast, the fact that women harboring constitutional epimutations in a small fraction of normal cells have increased risk of developing a TNBC harboring fully clonal BRCA1 epimutations strongly suggest BRCA1 deficiency to be an underlying cause in the tumor evolution. Most likely, the same argument applies to ER+ tumors harboring clonal BRCA1 epimutations, making these cancers valuable tools exploring the role of BRCA1 deficiency in development of ER+ breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.