Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998782›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2026

Building resilient and self-reliant systems for health for migrants and refugees in crisis-prone areas: lessons from the Thai-Myanmar border.

Watinee Kunpeuk, Hein Thu, Phitsanuruk Kanthawee, Surasak Thanaisawanyangkoon, John Patrick Almeida, Anuk Pitukthanin, Kyoko Sudo, Azusa Iwamoto, Masami Fujita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Watinee Kunpeuk *Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. watinee.ku@gmail.com.
Hein Thu *Digital Transformations for Health Lab, Geneva, Switzerland.
Phitsanuruk Kanthawee *School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Surasak Thanaisawanyangkoon *Health Systems Research Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
John Patrick Almeida *International Organization for Migration, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anuk Pitukthanin *Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kyoko Sudo *National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan.
Azusa Iwamoto *Japan Institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan.
Masami Fujita *Japan Institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migrants and other vulnerable populations remain insufficiently integrated into health security preparedness and universal health coverage (UHC) in the Asia-Pacific region. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionately affected migrants and displaced populations, the Asian Network for the Inclusion and Integration of Migrants and Other Vulnerable Populations in Health Security Preparedness and Achieving UHC (ANISE) was established to address gaps in pandemic preparedness frameworks. Since then, economic and political instability has driven large-scale and increasingly protracted displacement. At the same time, collapsing humanitarian financing and declining external support have placed severe pressure on migrant health responses, highlighting the need to move beyond short-term humanitarian approaches. This paper synthesizes lessons from the Myanmar border areas in Thailand by mapping insights from a regional pre-conference workshop onto three key elements of resilient and self-reliant systems for health. These elements include community-led and locally anchored capacities, cross-sectoral and cross-border institutional arrangements, and enabling governance with sustainable resource mobilization. The analysis illustrates how community networks, multisectoral collaboration, and integrated surveillance systems have supported communicable disease prevention and service delivery in border settings. The findings also highlight persistent barriers to achieving migrant-inclusive health security and UHC, including legal status constraints among undocumented migrants from Myanmar, limited affordability among migrants with low-socio-economic statuses, weak data coordination across health and local authorities for continuity of care, workforce shortages in border settings, and reliance on external donor funding affecting self-resilience. The recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funding cuts have further weakened nutrition, health protection, and disease control functions. Therefore, this crisis creates a stress test for systems for health serving migrants and refugees in crisis-prone border settings. Experiences from the Myanmar border areas in Thailand demonstrate that migrant health can no longer depend on temporary humanitarian responses or external funding alone. Strengthening resilient and self-reliant systems for health requires greater local ownership, domestic resource mobilization, and institutionalized governance that integrates migrant health within broader health security and UHC agendas.

Indexed as

Border healthHealth securityMigration healthResilient systems for healthSelf-reliant systems for healthThai–Myanmar borderUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID41998782
PMCPMC13151169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.