Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998775›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2026

Microbiological safety and immunoglobulin A retention in bottle-agitated Holder pasteurization of human milk.

Luis Jimenez, Jose Luis Flores-Vasquez, Miguel Angel Calvo-Gonzales, Paola Edith Ayma, Yanet Mendoza-Muñoz, Bryan Abarca, Theresa Jean Ochoa, Jorge Luis Galdos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis JimenezBioengineering Laboratory, Electronics Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Av. de la Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru. wl_jimenez@yahoo.com.
Jose Luis Flores-VasquezBioengineering Laboratory, Electronics Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Av. de la Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru.
Miguel Angel Calvo-GonzalesBioengineering Laboratory, Electronics Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Av. de la Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru.
Paola Edith AymaBioengineering Laboratory, Electronics Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Av. de la Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru.
Yanet Mendoza-MuñozBioengineering Laboratory, Electronics Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Av. de la Cultura 733, Cusco, Peru.
Bryan AbarcaHuman Milk Bank, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Regional Cusco, Av. de la Cultura S/N , Cusco, Peru.
Theresa Jean OchoaPediatric Infectious Diseases Research Unit, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Jorge Luis GaldosHuman Milk Bank, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Regional Cusco, Av. de la Cultura S/N , Cusco, Peru.

Funding

Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco Contract 04-2020-UNSAAC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines for donor human milk pasteurization in Peru and most low to middle income countries use Holder Pasteurization (HoP; 62.5 °C, 30 min) and indicate that the bottles containing milk should be agitated manually every 5 min during the 62.5 °C plateau. The guidelines also assume indirect control of the temperature inside the bottles through adjustments in the setpoint temperature of the water bath. Automatic agitation of the bottles could improve the dynamic temperature patterns to be closer to the target temperature. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of a pasteurizer with a particular automatic bottle-agitation method and compare it to manual HoP in terms of temperature patterns, control interventions, bacterial load reduction and immunoglobulin A retention.

methodsHuman milk was collected from healthy donor mothers at the Hospital Regional Cusco’s milk bank. Sixteen samples were mature milk pools, and fourteen samples were from individual mothers (three colostrum, seven transitional and four mature). An automatic shaking system using a low-power direct current (DC) motor with a velocity reduction gear was designed to provide azimuthal and vertical oscillations to a plexiglass rack holding the bottles submerged in the water bath. Bacterial load reduction was determined by inoculating the samples with known concentrations of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and determining the concentrations of surviving bacteria after pasteurization. The concentrations of IgA before and after pasteurization were determined by IgA enzyme linked immunoassay.

resultsThe automatic shaking vibration consisted of 50-degree peak-to-peak azimuthal rotation with short 14-millisecond vertical acceleration spikes of 3.6 m/s2. For E. coli, the logarithmic reduction factors were not significantly different between the automatic and manual bottle shaking pasteurization groups (5.247 versus 5.667, respectively, with p = 0.292). The IgA retention percentages for mature milk were 58.31% (SD = 9.2%) in the automated group and 37.33% (SD = 9.28%) in the manual group, and the difference was significant (P = 0.0001).

conclusionsThese results show that compared with pasteurization with automatic bottle agitation, manual bottle agitation causes a greater reduction in immunoglobulin A levels and requires more control interventions from users.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin AMilk, HumanPasteurizationBacterial LoadEscherichia coliFemaleFood MicrobiologyHumansMilk BanksStaphylococcus aureusTemperatureImmunoglobulin AAutomatic agitationBacterial count reductionDonor milkHolder pasteurizationImmunoglobulin A

Identifiers

PMID41998775
PMCPMC13217898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.