ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
"Hurtled down a track and then thrown off": experiences of longitudinal breast cancer care trajectories of women living with and beyond breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite established guidelines, women with breast cancer often experience complex care pathways. This study explored the lived experiences of treatment and service utilisation pathways for women living with and beyond breast cancer in Australia. We mapped real-world treatment journeys against optimal care pathway guidelines to identify specific gaps and improvement opportunities for healthcare delivery.
methodsWomen at least two years post initial diagnosis participated in semi-structured focus groups organised by cancer typology: non-metastatic, de novo metastatic, recurrent non-metastatic, and recurrent metastatic. Participants (n = 32) described their complete cancer care trajectories, including treatments received and services accessed. Framework analysis identified distinct care phases, compared experiences to guideline recommendations, and revealed nuanced experiences.
resultsAnalysis revealed five critical phases in breast cancer care: initial diagnosis and treatment planning, initial treatment, post-treatment care management and recovery, managing recurrent and progressive disease, and end-of-life care. Within these phases, 13 sub-phases showed consistent gaps between guidelines and patient experiences. Key challenges included poor care coordination and access, delayed diagnoses and navigation challenges in metastatic cases, poor tolerance of ongoing systemic therapy, and unmet end-of-life planning needs.
conclusionsThis study reveals complex longitudinal pathways in breast cancer care and highlights the distinct challenges women face at different phases. Findings demonstrate differences across non-metastatic and metastatic patients, and between primary and recurrent cases. Many participants experienced fragmented care, despite established guidelines. Continuity gaps across care phases suggest survivors may benefit from more tailored phase-specific support services. To improve care delivery, healthcare providers should develop targeted resources for each care phase, implement structured care transition protocols, and create specialised support programs that address the unique challenges within different survivor groups. These findings provide specific targets for healthcare systems to enhance cancer care continuity and reduce fragmentation in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.