ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Prediction of pathologic upstaging in ductal carcinoma in situ using MRI radiomics combined with clinicopathological features.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRI-based radiomics with SHAP interpretation for preoperative prediction of upstaging in ductal carcinomaTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCore needle biopsy (CNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis is limited by sampling error, potentially leading to under-staging and suboptimal management. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for DCIS upstaging based on preoperative MRI radiomics and clinicopathologic features, to assist in preoperative risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Additionally, we explored the potential value of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) as an adjunctive imaging biomarker.
methodsPreoperative MRI images and clinicopathological data were retrospectively collected from patients diagnosed with DCIS by CNB and treated surgically at our institution between December 2018 and April 2023. Radiomics features were extracted from tumor volume of interest and used to generate a radiomics score via LASSO regression. Tumor subregions were clustered by K-means based on signal intensity to derive an ITH score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of DCIS upstaging. Several multivariate logistic regression models were then developed based on these predictors. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. The final model was visualized with a nomogram.
resultsA total of 237 DCIS lesions from 232 patients (median age, 49 years [IQR, 43, 55]) were analyzed. Univariate analysis identified several factors associated with upstaging, including Ki67 ≥ 14%, higher nuclear grade, higher biopsy needle gauge, larger lesion size, and higher radiomics and ITH scores (all P < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, nuclear grade (OR range, 5.19–6.61[95% CI 1.0, 47.8]; all P < 0.05), biopsy needle gauge (OR, 1.17 [95% CI 1.02, 1.38]; P = 0.039), and radiomics score (OR, 1.95 [95% CI 1.25, 3.17]; P = 0.004) remained independent predictors. However, the ITH score was not independently predictive in the multivariate model and were excluded from the final model. The combined clinicopathologic and radiomics model demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70, 0.93) in the test set, outperforming both the clinicopathologic-only (AUC = 0.73) and radiomics-only (AUC = 0.75) models.
conclusionsThe combination of MRI radiomics score and clinicopathologic features effectively predicted DCIS upstaging, supporting their value in preoperative invasive risk assessment and treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.