ArticleBMC medical education2026
Developing curriculum archetypes as a reflective tool for health professions educators: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurriculum conceptualisations in health professions education (HPE) significantly influence teaching practices and learning outcomes, yet remain varied and often implicit among educators. This study aims to elucidate the diverse ways educators perceive and enact curriculum by developing an empirically grounded framework of curriculum archetypes.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 45 health professions educators across different disciplines and multiple institutions between January 2023 and December 2024. Interviews, lasting 45–75 min, explored participants’ views on curriculum conceptualisation, purpose, content, teaching practices, and institutional influences. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis to inductively derive patterns in curricular orientations. These themes were synthesised into a typology of curriculum archetypes reflecting distinct orientations and pedagogical tendencies.
resultsThe analysis identified five curriculum archetypes: (1) Focused Farah – Diligent Achiever, emphasising structured competency development; (2) Inquisitive Indra – Curious Wanderer, valuing inquiry and intellectual exploration; (3) Sociable Soo Mei – Social Connector, promoting co-creation and relational learning; (4) Rebellious Rizal – Resistant Rebel, challenging dominant norms to foster critical consciousness; and (5) Transformative Thivya – Identity Shaper, an archetype that frames curriculum as a deliberate journey of professional identity formation. These archetypes capture the complexity and diversity of curricular orientations in HPE and highlight tensions between standardisation and innovation.
conclusionsThis study presents the Curriculum Archetypes as a reflective tool for health professions educators that may help make curriculum conceptualisations more explicit. Specifically, the Curriculum Archetypes provide a new interpretive framing of curriculum conceptualisations, one of which foregrounds professional identity formation. The study also proposes potential uses of the framework for educator self-reflection and curriculum review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.