Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998602›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Individual and environmental determinants of body mass index trajectories: results from a longitudinal study in Southern Sweden.

Pauline Rebouillat, Kristoffer Mattisson, Giedre Gefenaite, Per-Olof Östergren, Peter M Nilsson, Jonas Björk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pauline RebouillatDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. pauline.rebouillat@med.lu.se.
Kristoffer MattissonDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Giedre GefenaiteDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Per-Olof ÖstergrenSocial Medicine and Global Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jonas BjörkDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to natural environments is thought to benefit mental and physical health, but current evidence is mixed, and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Considering the joint biodiversity, climate, and health crises, a better understanding of the interplay between individuals and their environment is imperative. This study aimed to (1) identify Body Mass Index (BMI) trajectories in the Scania Public Health Cohort (SPHC), (2) characterise trajectories in terms of sociodemographics, lifestyle, health and living environments, (3) study the associations between natural dimensions of residential environment and BMI trajectories. The SPHC was established in southern Sweden in 2000. Participants (n = 13 581 at baseline, 18–80 years old) responded to four surveys (2000–2016), including sociodemographic, lifestyle and health questions. Residential coordinates were linked to the Scania outdoor Environment Database, which comprised perceived sensory dimensions of residential areas, eight dimensions of the outdoor environment that have previously been identified as important to support people’s health. An adapted version of the Perceived Sensory Dimension Score (PSD3-score) was computed by summing up three dimensions related to the natural environment. Sex-specific BMI trajectories, identified using group-based trajectory modelling, were compared using adjusted multinomial regression. Five BMI trajectories were identified with similar shapes in men and women. Two trajectories started in the normal/overweight categories and were relatively stable over time, while the other three were close to or above the commonly used threshold for obesity. Overall, more favourable socioeconomic and lifestyle factors were observed within non-obese trajectories. The PSD3-score varied geographically across Scania, but for the selected environmental characteristics, little differences were observed in relation to BMI trajectories. For this population, our findings suggest that lifestyle and socioeconomic factors are more important than outdoor environment features for the long-term bodyweight and obesity development.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexEnvironmentResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSwedenenvironmental epidemiologygreenspacesneighbourhoodobesitysociodemographic factors

Identifiers

PMID41998602
PMCPMC13091265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.