ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Determinants of high chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test scores according to airflow limitation severity: a three-year prospective study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) scores according to airflow limitation severity are not fully understood.
methodsWe aimed to elucidate this by analyzing data from 378 patients with COPD, categorized into two groups based on airflow limitation severity (FEV1 > 50% [GOLD-mild] and ≤ 50% [GOLD-severe]). Within each severity group, patients were further sub-stratified by CAT score (≥ 10 vs. <10).
resultsPatients with CAT scores ≥ 10 in the GOLD-mild group were older, with more severe airflow limitation and higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, depression, and diabetes, whereas those in the GOLD-severe group showed higher GERD and asthma prevalences. GERD and asthma contributed predominantly to respiratory-specific items. Airflow limitation and GERD were strong determinants in both severity groups. Key determinants were anxiety and depression in the GOLD-mild group and asthma in the GOLD-severe group. These associations remained consistent over 3 years.
conclusionsThese findings offer valuable insights for managing patients with pronounced subjective symptoms in COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.