Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998558›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026

Attitudes and perceptions of health care professionals concerning chiropractors and chiropractic practice: a systematic review.

Dave Newell, Amin Nouroozi, Marc Sanders, Jonathan Field, Kenneth Young, Michelle M Holmes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dave NewellHealth Sciences University, Bournemouth, UK. david.newell@hsu.ac.uk.
Amin NourooziHealth Sciences University, Bournemouth, UK.
Marc SandersPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jonathan FieldPrivate Practice, Basingstoke, UK.
Kenneth YoungCollege of Sport, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle M HolmesHealth Sciences University, Bournemouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChiropractic care often exists outside of national healthcare systems, with exceptions in some national settings. This situation has led to suboptimal interprofessional communication and referral, with implications for the provision of appropriate and efficient care. To find solutions, the attitudes and perceptions of other professions must be better understood. We conducted a systematic review to assess other healthcare professionals’ perceptions and attitudes towards chiropractors and chiropractic care.

methodsThe review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023403381). Reporting was guided by the PRISMA statement. A search was carried out on PubMed, CINAHL, AMED, Index of Chiropractic Literature (ICL) and MEDLINE in Jan 2021 and updated on Jan 2022, February 2023 and June 2024. We included qualitative and quantitative study designs, focusing on healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward and perceptions of chiropractic. Methodological quality was assessed using the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine tools for qualitative and cross-sectional survey studies.

resultsThe search retrieved 245 articles, of which 43 were included for review. Studies had been conducted across multiple national jurisdictions A total of 10,108 participants were included across the studies, including primary and secondary healthcare professionals as well as healthcare students. Issues identified with influencing opinions of chiropractic practice included participants’ knowledge of chiropractic methods, scope of practice, interprofessional communication, research base, and education. While some participants reported a perception of positive clinical outcomes associated with chiropractic care, communication between healthcare professionals and chiropractors was often lacking. Attitudes towards chiropractic varied, with factors like knowledge, patient interest, and referrals influencing perceptions.

conclusionsTo improve interprofessional attitudes and perceptions, the chiropractic profession might prioritise increased communication and information access concerning contemporary chiropractic care with other health care professions including educational interventions. Mitigation of a persistent lack of reliable information may improve how the profession is perceived in general, reduce misinformation and increase the likelihood that patients receive the joined-up care they need.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChiropracticHealth PersonnelHumansAttitudesChiropractic practiceChiropractorsHealthcare professionalsPerceptions

Identifiers

PMID41998558
PMCPMC13220559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.