ArticleBMC public health2026
Rural health inequalities in perceived HIV vulnerability and nutritional status: a cross-comparison of rural communities in West and Southern Africa.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent rural health inequities across Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly regarding HIV burden and nutritional deficiencies, remain a major public health concern, yet evidence indicates that rural disadvantage is neither uniform nor neutral. Anchored in the social determinants of health framework, this study compared household income, healthcare access, and housing quality/sanitation between rural populations in West and Southern Africa; examined cross-national differences in perceived HIV burden and nutritional deficiency; and assessed how these determinants relate to both outcomes. We analysed primary cross-sectional survey data from stratified samples in Ntabankulu villages, South Africa (n = 288) and Iwo villages, Nigeria (n = 205). Cross-country differences were tested using independent-samples t-tests, and associations were estimated using country-stratified multivariable OLS regressions mutually adjusting for income, healthcare access, and housing quality/sanitation. Results show clear contrasts: South Africa reports higher perceived income and better housing/sanitation, whereas Nigeria reports better perceived healthcare access; however, South Africa records higher perceived HIV burden and nutritional deficiency. In adjusted models, income (β = - 0.384) and healthcare access (β = - 0.196) were associated with lower perceived HIV burden in South Africa, while housing quality/sanitation (β = - 0.338) was associated with lower perceived HIV burden in Nigeria. For nutritional deficiency, income was the strongest predictor in South Africa (β = - 0.383), whereas healthcare access (β = - 0.344) and income (β = - 0.246) were significant in Nigeria. These findings suggest that rural health inequalities are structurally driven and context-dependent, stressing the need for country-specific (rather than uniform) policy responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.