Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998514›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

"Comparative effects of rotational effleurage and connective tissue massage on labor pain, duration, and perineal outcomes in pregnant women": a randomized clinical trial.

Sheida Sheidaee, Sara Azima, Mehrab Sayadi, Zahra Yazdanpanahi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sheida SheidaeeStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2249-8500
Sara AzimaDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-4796
Mehrab SayadiCardiovascular research center, shiraz university of medical sciences, shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-705X
Zahra YazdanpanahiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, , Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Z_yazdanpanahi@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-9924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildbirth is a unique and significant experience in every woman's life. A negative childbirth experience, often due to difficult labor, can adversely affect a mother's feelings toward her baby and their subsequent relationship. Massage, a non-pharmacological pain relief method involving coordinated manipulation of soft tissues by hand, aims to alleviate pain and enhance comfort. This ancient technique is widely used during labor and has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing both the intensity and duration of labor pain. This study aimed to compare the effects of two massage methods-rotational effleurage massage and connective tissue massage (CTM)-on pain intensity and labor outcomes. The study subjects in the two intervention groups received effleurage massage and connective tissue massage, but the control group did not receive any intervention and only routine labor care was provided to them.

methodsThis quasi-experimental, multicenter study was conducted on 90 pregnant women (gestational age 38-40 weeks) admitted in labor at three hospitals. Participants were selected through convenience sampling and randomly allocated into three groups of 30 using permuted block randomization within each center. Although random allocation was performed, due to the multicenter design and non-probability sampling, the study is more accurately classified as quasi-experimental. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data collection tools included a demographic and obstetric questionnaire, the McGill Childbirth Satisfaction Questionnaire, a visual analogue scale for pain, and a labor evaluation checklist. DATA: Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). In this randomized clinical trial, 90 primiparous women were randomly assigned to three groups: effleurage massage, Connective tissue massage, and control. The interventions were performed during the active phase of labor (4-10 cm cervical dilation). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale at different dilation stages: 3-4 cm, 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm).

resultsPain intensity significantly decreased in both intervention groups compared to the control group at all stages of the active phase of labor (p < 0.001). At 7-8 cm dilation, the mean pain scores were 6.13 ± 0.94 in the effleurage group, 6.23 ± 0.77 in the connective tissue massage group, and 7.87 ± 0.86 in the control group (p < 0.001). Effleurage massage demonstrated greater efficacy than connective tissue massage in reducing pain during the later stages of active labor (p < 0.05).

conclusionEffleurage massage was more effective than connective tissue massage in reducing pain intensity during active labor. Integrating effleurage into maternity care as a non-pharmacological method may improve maternal comfort and support positive birth experiences.

Indexed as

Labor PainMassagePain ManagementAdultConnective TissueFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPerineumPregnancyTreatment OutcomeConnective tissue massageLabor outcomePain intensityPregnant womenRotational effleurage massage

Identifiers

PMID41998514
PMCPMC13088850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.