ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Olfactory learning in two Amblypygi species Paraphrynus laevifrons and Phrynus pseudoparvulus.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wide diversity of arthropod taxa have demonstrated the capacity for learning, but most of our current understanding comes from only a select subset of this highly diverse clade, with most studies focusing on various insect groups. Amblypygids (Order Amblypygi, Class Arachnida), however, are emerging as a model group for studying sensory integration and the neural substrates associated with learning and memory, especially as it relates to navigation. These nocturnal creatures possess specialized sensory appendages and one of the largest and most complex mushroom bodies - the part of the arthropod brain associated with learning and memory - of any arthropod. Prior field studies on multiple species demonstrate sophisticated homing abilities while laboratory-based behavioral assays in Phrynus marginemaculatus confirm olfactory-based learning associated with a refuge. In this study, we expand these laboratory-based assays to test the olfactory learning ability of two additional amblypygid species - Paraphrynus laevifrons and Phrynus pseudoparvulus - for which field data suggest complex navigation. We trained each species to associate an open refuge with a distinct chemical stimulus, using slightly different species-specific experimental details. We found evidence of olfactory learning in the training trials for both species, with an unexpected pattern of seeming avoidance learning of hexanol. Our test trials did not show significant associations with the trained stimulus, but this may have been in part due to our experimental design. Ultimately, we find some evidence of olfactory learning in additional amblypygid species, but our findings raise additional questions and highlight the need for species-specific study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.