ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Effects of similar information in the search task on visual working memory representation.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual working memory (VWM) plays a crucial role in receiving essential information and filtering out interference in the midst of an abundance of information. During the VWM maintenance phase, the VWM representations are affected by similar (to the memory content) information. The sensory-recruitment hypothesis attributes this to the overlap in cortical areas between the VWM representation and the perceptual stimulus representation. In addition, the storage and maintenance of VWM and the processing of external visual stimuli may compete for the same attention resources. Similar information impacts existing VWM representations through integration and replacement; however, the regulatory effects of attentional resources on these processes remain poorly understood. This study used a dual-task paradigm in which participants were required to complete an additional search task during the maintenance phase of a working memory task. Under difficulty control, Experiment 1 examined how similarity and attentional engagement modulate integration and substitution. Experiment 2 employed peripheral cues to dissociate attentional demands between these mechanisms, while Experiment 3 further validated differential sensitivity by manipulating search difficulty to control attention resource allocation. Results demonstrate that integration is regulated by both similarity and attentional resources, whereas replacement is solely governed by similarity. Crucially, integration requires attentional engagement as a requisite premise, while replacement operates without such necessity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.