Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998443›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Clinical spectrum and treatment responses in.

Xiao Xiao, Xiaoqi Chen, Hao Zheng, Miao Xiong, Yuhang Liu, Li Jiang, Yue Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao XiaoDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoqi ChenDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hao ZhengDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Miao XiongDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuhang LiuDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li JiangDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yue HuDepartment of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. huyue915@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7166-4248

Funding

CQMU Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine No.W0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the genotype-phenotype relationships betweenchildren with PRRT2 gene variants and 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 68 patients with PRRT2 variants and 16 patients with 16p11.2 microdeletionsyndrome at the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical Universitybetween February 2015 and August 2024. Genetic testing included whole-exome sequencing and copy number variation sequencing.

results(1) PRRT2 Cohort (n=68): Clinical diagnoses included benign familial infantile epilepsy (49/68), paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (4/68),infantile convulsions with paroxysmal choreoathetosis (8/68), and otherepilepsy subtypes (7/68). Genetic analysis revealed frameshift variants in 89.7% (61/68), with c.649dupC as the predominant mutation(penetrance:77.2%). Electroencephalography detected epileptiformdischarges in 45.6% of cases. Brain MRI showed nonspecific abnormalities,including widened extra-axial spaces (75%). Oxcarbazepine showed bettertherapeutic efficacy than levetiracetam. (2) 16p11.2 microdeletion cohort (n=16): This group exhibited moresevere phenotypes: The incidence of persistent status epilepticus may behigher (18.8% vs 2.9%, P=0.045, q=0.084), with 87.5% being de novovariants and 81.2% having negative family history. Compared with the PRRT2 group, these patients had significantly increased risks of congenitalheart disease, global developmental delay, and structural brainabnormalities (all P < 0.05).

conclusionPRRT2-related disorders are characterized by incompletepenetrance and benign clinical courses, whereas 16p11.2 microdeletionsyndrome manifests complex phenotypic spectra due to polygenicinvolvement, necessitating distinct diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderChromosome DisordersEpilepsy, Benign NeonatalIntellectual DisabilityMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 16DystoniaFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansInfantMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPRRT2 protein, human16p11.2 microdeletion syndromeComorbiditiesGenotype-phenotypePRRT2 Variants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.