ReviewPsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2026
School-based interventions for sexual education and sexual violence prevention in adolescence: systematic review.
Review in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSexual violence against adolescents constitutes a serious violation of human rights, with negative repercussions on the physical, emotional, and social development of this population. Comprehensive Sexuality Education interventions have proven to be promising strategies for preventing violence in school contexts, as they promote adolescent empowerment and recognize sexuality as a fundamental dimension of human development.
objectiveThis systematic review examined interventions conducted with high school adolescents in school contexts, focusing on comprehensive sexuality education and the universal prevention of sexual violence in adolescence.
methodsThe PRISMA guidelines and PICOS criteria were used to identify, select, evaluate, and synthesize the included studies. The databases searched were SciELO, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, DOAJ and PubMed. Risk of bias was systematically assessed using design-specific tools according to study type, including the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for qualitative studies, ROBUST for observational designs, RoB 2 for randomized trials, and ROBINS-I for non-randomized interventions, ensuring methodological rigor and comparability across study designs.
resultsA total of 15 studies published between 2019 and 2024 were identified through electronic databases. The findings indicated that interventions were most effective in increasing knowledge about sexually transmitted infections, contraceptive methods, and consent. However, low consistency was observed in translating such knowledge into behavioral change, with limited outcomes in improving protective practices and effectively reducing indicators of sexual violence. The main limitations involved the use of convenience samples, lack of follow-up, absence of analyses considering the intersectionality of race, gender, and sexuality, and the exclusion of content related to LGBTQIAPN+ populations.
conclusionThe findings of this review reveal limitations stemming from the heterogeneity of methodological designs, restricting the potential for broader generalizations. While the studies demonstrated efficacy in knowledge promotion, limitations were observed regarding the effective prevention of sexual violence against adolescents, possibly related to the evaluation measures employed and the stigmatized nature of the topics addressed. Future research should adopt more robust methodologies, include longitudinal follow-ups of interventions, and engage social actors from the context to develop content that is more socially relevant and tailored to participants’ needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.