ArticleHealth & justice2026
Mental health diversion and criminal justice outcomes: a population-based cohort study of 53,605 justice-involved adolescents.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncarceration of adolescents is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, yet high-quality evidence comparing its effectiveness to non-custodial alternatives is limited. We compared mental health diversion, community-based legal orders, and custodial sentencing in reducing reoffending among justice-involved adolescents. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health and justice records from New South Wales, Australia, including all adolescents aged 10 to 17 years with a conviction between an index court finalization between 2 July 2001 and 24 December 2020. The primary outcome was first proven reoffending within 12 months following first court finalization in adolescence.
resultsAmong 53,605 justice-involved adolescents, 2,171 (4.0%) received mental health diversion, 44,887 (83.8%) community orders, and 6,547 (12.2%) custodial sentences. Standardized any-reoffending risk was 47.2% under diversion, 56.6% under community orders, and 64.5% under custody. Diversion was associated with an absolute risk difference of − 17.7% points compared with custody (95% CI − 23.2 to − 12.1) and − 9.9% points compared with community orders (95% CI − 14.9 to − 4.1). The risk difference for community orders compared with custody was − 7.8% points (95% CI − 12.8 to − 3.3). Reduction in reoffending under diversion were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders (− 26.5% points, 95% CI − 34.9 to − 18.3), mood disorders (− 22.9% points, 95% CI − 37.2 to − 6.4), and intellectual disability (− 38.0% points compared with community orders, 95% CI − 60.0 to − 14.5).
conclusionsMental health diversion and community orders reduced reoffending risk compared with custody. Effects were greatest among adolescents with disruptive behavioural disorders, mood disorders, and intellectual disability. These findings support the use of non-custodial sentencing for justice-involved adolescents with mental health disorders and indicate that those with neurodevelopmental and externalizing presentations may benefit most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.