ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Perianal pathology beyond fistulizing disease: spectrum of MRI findings and diagnostic pitfalls.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the perianal region is frequently performed in the context of fistulizing disease; however, a broad spectrum of non-fistulizing conditions may also affect this region. A wide variety of inflammatory, infectious, vascular, cystic, and neoplastic conditions, as well as anatomical variants and post-surgical changes, may involve the perianal region and often present with overlapping or nonspecific clinical manifestations.MRI, owing to its superior soft tissue contrast and multiplanar capability, plays a central role in the evaluation of perianal pathology. Beyond lesion detection, MRI enables accurate characterization, assessment of disease extent, and differentiation between entities that may be clinically indistinguishable, thereby supporting appropriate therapeutic decision-making. Importantly, perianal abnormalities may also be incidentally detected on pelvic MRI studies performed for unrelated indications. In such cases, unfamiliarity with the full spectrum of perianal findings may represent a source of diagnostic uncertainty, particularly for less experienced radiologists.This review focuses on the MRI appearance of non-fistulizing perianal pathology, emphasizing key imaging features that aid in differential diagnosis across a broad range of benign and malignant conditions. Representative cases from routine clinical practice are presented to illustrate typical and atypical imaging patterns, as well as common diagnostic pitfalls. Selected complementary computed tomography findings are included when relevant.Given the relative infrequency of many perianal conditions, comprehensive knowledge of their MRI features, along with recognition of normal anatomical variants and expected post-treatment appearances, is essential. Such familiarity helps avoid misinterpretation, unnecessary invasive procedures, and delayed diagnosis, ultimately contributing to improved patient management and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.