ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Automated report-based tracking of pancreatic cysts: implications for guideline-defined growth classification.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a hybrid large language model (LLM)- and rule-based algorithm for tracking pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) across serial radiology reports and apply it to a single-center cohort to characterize cyst growth using first-to-last and consecutive comparisons.
methodsThis retrospective study included all abdominal imaging reports interpreted by abdominal radiologists between 2005 and 2024. A validated LLM identified reports describing PCLs. A hybrid algorithm combining LLM-extracted cyst features (size, location) with rule-based logic matched dominant cysts across serial reports. Two blinded radiologists independently annotated cyst matches in a subset of reports. Agreement between algorithm and radiologists was assessed using percent agreement and Cohen's κ. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third radiologist for error analysis. Absolute size-based growth was assessed according to American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria, whereas cyst growth rate as a worrisome feature was assessed per Kyoto criterion, using both first-to-last and consecutive studies. Predictors of meeting the Kyoto cyst growth rate criterion were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression.
resultsIn 58 patients with 418 longitudinal reports, agreement with the adjudicated reference standard was 96%. Cohen's κ was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-0.91). The overall cohort included 8,176 patients (61.8% female; mean age 67.6 ± 11.7 years) with 8,389 cysts across 28,489 reports over 40.6 ± 28.5 months (annual growth rate = 0.35 mm/year). ACR absolute growth criteria classified a higher proportion of cysts than the Kyoto cyst growth rate criterion using first-to-last examinations (16.3% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001), whereas Kyoto cyst growth rate criterion identified a higher proportion using consecutive examinations (21.4% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). Larger baseline cyst size predicted meeting the Kyoto cyst growth rate criterion (HR 1.9-4.0; highest HR 4.0, 95% CI 3.08-5.21; p < 0.001).
conclusionA hybrid LLM-rule-based algorithm enables reliable automated longitudinal tracking of PCLs across serial radiology reports. When applied at scale, cyst growth classification varied according to the guideline framework and interval comparison method used, and baseline cyst size was the strongest predictor of meeting Kyoto growth rate threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.