Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998396›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Development of a deep learning-based tool for coronary artery stenosis evaluation in forensic autopsies using whole slide imaging.

Nicola Pigaiani, Shakiba Sharifi, Marianna Garavello, Francesco Setti, Francesco Ausania, Federica Bortolotti, Alberto Chighine, Ernesto D'Aloja, Pamela Rodegher, Serena Ammendola and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicola Pigaiani *Section of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy. nicola.pigaiani@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-4955
Shakiba Sharifi *Section of Engineering and Physics, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6309-635X
Marianna GaravelloSection of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6810-8031
Francesco SettiSection of Engineering and Physics, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-5534
Francesco AusaniaSection of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-8551
Federica BortolottiSection of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9568-4585
Alberto ChighineSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-9712
Ernesto D'AlojaSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-6252
Pamela RodegherSection of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy.
Serena AmmendolaUnit of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-0896
Matteo BrunelliSection of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-2676
Marco CristaniSection of Engineering and Physics, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-6042
Stefano GobboSection of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-5233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality, with coronary artery disease accounting for over 60% of cases in adults. Accurate quantification of coronary stenosis in forensic autopsies is crucial for determining causality between pathological findings and death, but is hindered by subjective visual assessments and inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop an AI-driven tool using whole-slide images for objective stenosis measurement in forensic investigations. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 98 anonymized H&E-stained autopsy slides (234 coronary sections), 103 high-quality regions of interest were selected and split into training (n = 82), validation (n = 14), and test (n = 7) datasets. Annotations delineated lumen, internal elastic lamina, and external elastic lamina using QuPath. A SegFormer-B0 transformer model was trained with data augmentation, weighted cross-entropy loss, and AdamW optimization. Post-processing enforced anatomical structural hierarchy and generated hybrid confidence maps.

resultsOn validation dataset, agreement with ground truth was excellent (MAE 3.22% points; RMSE 4.00; MAPE 6.07%; r = 0.986; ICC = 0.986), with slight underestimation. Bland–Altman bias was − 1.36 pp (95% LoA − 9.01 to 6.28 pp), indicating performance across severities. On the test set, accuracy improved (MAE 1.01 pp; RMSE 1.50; MAPE 2.11%; r = 0.998; ICC = 0.995) and outperformed three pathologists’ visual estimates (MAE 16.11, 8.18, 4.79 pp). Bland–Altman bias for the model was − 0.82 pp with tight limits of agreement (− 3.48 to 1.83 pp). Total inference time was 199.08 s for seven cases (28.44 s/image).

conclusionsWSI-based transformer pipeline enables rapid, auditable, and reproducible coronary stenosis measurement, reducing inter-observer variability and supporting standardized interpretation in forensic investigations.

Indexed as

Coronary StenosisDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAutopsyForensic ImagingForensic PathologyHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular pathologyCoronary stenosisDigital pathologyForensic pathologyWhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID41998396
PMCPMC13275746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.