ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Development of a deep learning-based tool for coronary artery stenosis evaluation in forensic autopsies using whole slide imaging.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality, with coronary artery disease accounting for over 60% of cases in adults. Accurate quantification of coronary stenosis in forensic autopsies is crucial for determining causality between pathological findings and death, but is hindered by subjective visual assessments and inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop an AI-driven tool using whole-slide images for objective stenosis measurement in forensic investigations. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom 98 anonymized H&E-stained autopsy slides (234 coronary sections), 103 high-quality regions of interest were selected and split into training (n = 82), validation (n = 14), and test (n = 7) datasets. Annotations delineated lumen, internal elastic lamina, and external elastic lamina using QuPath. A SegFormer-B0 transformer model was trained with data augmentation, weighted cross-entropy loss, and AdamW optimization. Post-processing enforced anatomical structural hierarchy and generated hybrid confidence maps.
resultsOn validation dataset, agreement with ground truth was excellent (MAE 3.22% points; RMSE 4.00; MAPE 6.07%; r = 0.986; ICC = 0.986), with slight underestimation. Bland–Altman bias was − 1.36 pp (95% LoA − 9.01 to 6.28 pp), indicating performance across severities. On the test set, accuracy improved (MAE 1.01 pp; RMSE 1.50; MAPE 2.11%; r = 0.998; ICC = 0.995) and outperformed three pathologists’ visual estimates (MAE 16.11, 8.18, 4.79 pp). Bland–Altman bias for the model was − 0.82 pp with tight limits of agreement (− 3.48 to 1.83 pp). Total inference time was 199.08 s for seven cases (28.44 s/image).
conclusionsWSI-based transformer pipeline enables rapid, auditable, and reproducible coronary stenosis measurement, reducing inter-observer variability and supporting standardized interpretation in forensic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.