ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Heterogeneous trajectory of cancer-related fatigue and its associated factors in patients with glioma during the perioperative period: a prospective longitudinal study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying the trajectory of SPPADE symptoms in patients with cancer using electronic health record data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFatigue is the most severe symptom of glioma and constitutes an adverse prognostic factor for patient survival. This study explored the potential categories and influencing factors of the change trajectory of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with gliomas during the perioperative period.
methodsOverall, 193 patients who underwent glioma resection in two tertiary general hospitals in Guangzhou from 1 December 2023 to 1 January 2025 were included. Data on social demographics, disease characteristics, psychological resilience, neuroticism, and perceived social support levels were collected. CRF was assessed 1 day preoperatively and 3, 7, 14, and 30 days postoperatively. A latent growth mixture model was used to identify potential categories of the change trajectory of CRF, and a disordered multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to explore influencing factors.
resultsOverall, 161 patients with glioma were included. Potential CRF categories were 'low fatigue decreased' (71.4%), 'moderate fatigue increased' (17.4%), and 'persistently high fatigue' (11.2%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with pathological grades III-IV (odds ratio [OR] = 2.71, P = 0.035), lower perceived social support (OR = 0.955, P = 0.033), and longer hospital stay (OR = 1.071, P = 0.006) were more likely to be classified into the 'moderate fatigue increased' group. In contrast, patients with pathological grades III-IV (OR = 5.78, P = 0.007) and lower resilience (OR = 0.935, P = 0.001) were more likely to be assigned to the 'persistently high fatigue' group.
conclusion'Low fatigue decreased', 'moderate fatigue increased', and 'persistently high fatigue' are potential CRF categories in patients with glioma during the perioperative period. Pathological stage, perceived social support, length of hospital stay, and resilience influence these patterns. Early screening for high-risk patients and individualised, full-course interventions are essential to reduce CRF burden during the perioperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.