ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Early microbial colonization study of daily-use plastics exposed to river water.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In rivers, microorganisms colonize plastic surfaces, initiating processes that can lead to their microbial decomposition. Our study investigates the bacterial community composition and diversity on the surfaces of plastics used daily, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE), which were exposed to river water from the Aller and Fusche rivers. Glass was used for comparison purposes. 16s rRNA sequencing revealed that the type of surface and the native microbial community in the river water, including the water quality, significantly influenced biofilm community assembly. River water samples, especially from the Fusche site, supported the highest microbial richness, while plastic exhibited moderate diversity, and glass beads hosted the lowest richness and diversity. Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes dominated across all samples, with notable enrichment of functionally relevant families such as Rhodobacteraceae and Comamonadaceae. Ecologically relevant genera such as Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga, Rhodoferax, Sediminibacterium, and Rhodobacter dominated across samples. Alpha diversity reflected the richness of taxa within each sample, while beta diversity revealed distinct clustering based on both plastic type and site, indicating the influence of ecological pressure and niche partitioning. These findings highlight the capacity of plastic surfaces to harbour diverse and specialised bacterial assemblages, with implications for biogeochemical cycling, pollutant interactions, and potential microbial degradation pathways. This work contributes to deciphering the ecological roles of biofilms in freshwater plastisphere micro-environments and underscores the importance of material-specific microbial dynamics in assessing environmental risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.